Lawyers for the defendants also attempted to nitpick the statistical testimony indicating that the resulting elections irregularities yielded highly improbable vote totals.
Declare any fraud be caught and brought to justice
However, Texas went back to the statistician, and he pointed out in a second affidavit why his conclusions still stand. One strange pattern is that, looking at the top 50 urban areas in the country, Biden in 2020 did worse than Clinton did in 2016. But in four of the five urban areas of the defendant states, Biden significantly outperformed Clinton. That is highly improbable. In the words of the statistical expert, “Coincidences are possible, but relying on them is questionable.”
We do not necessarily agree with advertisements on this page
Be the first to comment