The truth always wins. We may lose for a while but the truth comes out in the end.
Nebraska AG Peterson analysed the facts and concluded, HQC and IVM are getting results and those critical of these treatments, showed no evidence to prove their case. I wonder if critics of these treatments are deliberately giving negative reports.
The Lancet, so called research, certainly failed to provide evidence! The Lancet editor said the research was fabricated!
The Lancet published junk research condemning HQC and IVM which affected Governments and doctors. Ill-advised Governments and medical professionals ignored the science, doctors were cancelled and fired from their jobs. Truth marched on.
Those who had the courage and foresight to investigate the truth, continue using HQC and IVM saving thousands of lives.
Japan, India, Mexico and many other countries have been using HQC and IVM saving thousands of lives. One state in India, with a population of 250M, is now Covid free because they had the courage and foresight to use ivermectin.
Keep declaring Governments wake up and follow the science, end lock downs, end mandates and drop the passports, provide treatments of HCQ and IVM, the People stand up speaking the truth to their Government officials and media
CHD: “Yesterday, Nebraska Attorney General (AG) Doug Peterson issued a legal opinion that Nebraska healthcare providers can legally prescribe off-label medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID, so long as they obtain informed consent from the patient.”
“The Lancet’s own editor-in-chief admitted that the paper was a ‘fabrication,’ a ‘monumental fraud’ and a ‘shocking example of research misconduct’ in the middle of a global health emergency,” Peterson wrote in the opinion.
“We finally have a leader who puts constitutional rights, peer-reviewed science and human health above industry profits. Doug Peterson is uncowed and unbowed — a genuine hero on horseback for all Americans.” Kennedy said.
“This ‘highly significant’ correlation manifests itself not only ‘in a worldwide context’ but also when comparing African countries that regularly administer prophylactic ‘ivermectin against parasitic infections’ and African countries that do not,” Peterson wrote.
Peterson cited several studies showing ivermectin led to improvement of COVID outcomes when used in early treatment or as a prophylaxis, while noting many studies with negative findings about ivermectin “excluded most available evidence,” cherry picked data within studies, misreported data, made unsupported assertions of adverse reactions to ivermectin and had “conclusions that did follow from evidence.”
Leave a Reply